Is a euro in a Cypriot bank, locked down by withdrawal
limits and capital controls, the same as a euro in an Irish or French bank?
Is a euro sitting in, say, a payroll account in Laiki with a
balance of more than €100,000 (and subject to an unspecified “haircut” on
Thursday ) the same an “Irish euro”?
They’re both euro, both promises to pay the bearer, but
honestly, do you have a preference? Of course you do. You’d prefer your money
to be outside Cyprus. You’d prefer an Irish euro to a Cypriot one. So they’re
not the same. Do we even have a single currency now, then? What does the Euro mean?
And how did this happen? At least in part, it happened because
all the finance ministers of the Eurozone sat around earlier this month and let
the Cypriots leave the room with a proposal to make depositors pay for bank
losses, including insured depositors with balances of less than €100,000. They rowed
back on that part, but you can’t undo the damage of their having taken it
seriously to begin with. Imagine a
snowed-in family just once agreeing “if we get really hungry, we can eat the
rabbit”. You can take that back all you like – everybody knows the rabbit’s
not safe any more. He’s not just a pet, he’s protein. Depositors aren’t just protected
customers now, they’re also a source of money to save the bank.
We sat back and let that happen – all the Eurozone countries
did. We let deposits in Cyprus undergo that subtle shift in meaning. We let
their banks be closed for ages, with devastating impact on small firms
and families. We let their tax rate be changed. We let them hang out there, hoping
it would save us, the rest of this uneasy union. Where does that leave solidarity, in this European Project under our presidency?
Just now, you’d prefer an Irish euro to a Cypriot one.
Remember that feeling, because, as Martin Niemöller might have written were he more
interested in money, and living in more peaceful times, “First they came for the
Cypriots ...”
Sheila Killian
@islandtotheleft
2 comments:
Please go back and re-write the ending. No matter how appalling the behaviour of the Eurozone ministers was, it does not compare with the planned, systematic rounding up, transport and extermination of a people because of their religion that was perpetrated by the Nazi regime, and should not be compared with that.
I fully agree it doesn't compare with the Nazi regime, Tom. I'm talking more about a different application of Niemöller's basic idea, which is why there are modifiers in there about money and peaceful times.
I've always read Niemöller's words as being a very powerful indictment of the dangers of inaction and silence by those who could speak out against any injustice - like MLK's "silence of the good people" quote. I think they're widely relevant, beyond their original context.
Post a Comment